Return to site

Competing Against a Non-Compete

Non-competes used to only show up in a few very specialized jobs.  They prevented sales people from running off to a competitor with their sales lists. Or scientists and engineers from bringing their inside design knowledge over to a competitor.
But these days, non-compete clauses are showing up even in basic jobs. Jimmy John's fast food restaurants are under investigation in New York for using non-compete clauses in that block workers for two years from going over to a competitor. 
This week, the Wall Street Journal reported that a Thomson-Reuters Corp. legal reporter was fired after it learned she had signed a non-compete when she was employed at a competitor. 
It is an odd state of the law.  If two competitors agree not to poach each other's employees, they could well face a major antitrust action.  But if they strike agreements with their own employees, they often can get the same result legally.
In Massachusetts, courts will not enforce non-competition agreements meant solely to protect employers from run-of-the-mill business competition. Marine Contractors Co., Inc. v. Hurley, 310 N.E.2d 915, 920 (1974). But a non-compete can be valid if the business can show that it was intended for the protection of "trade secrets, other confidential information, [and] ... the good will the employer has acquired through dealings with his customers" constitute legitimate business interests. Id.; see also Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. Danahy, 21 Mass.App.Ct. 488, 488 N.E.2d 22, 28 (1986).
Since this depends heavily on the circumstances of the case, it is important to discuss these issues with an attorney. 

All Posts

Almost done…

We just sent you an email. Please click the link in the email to confirm your subscription!